Please also visit the unofficial Zimbabwe Defence Forces website.

Friday 8 June 2012

The Learning Forces

From its RF, ZANLA and ZIPRA foundations, through the Mozambique war and Matabeleland disturbances, the ZNA as an institution has fought as or against guerrilla movements. With learnings from the war in DRC, the first conventional war the defence force has fought if we discount the Rhodesian involvement in WWII, the ZDF has been transforming itself through re-organisation, revising and developing tactic and re-equipping in line with its new fighting doctrine and the changing world and its threats. One cannot miss the new “combat group” formations replacing the traditional “infantry battalions”. Made operational in 2010, the concept is design to give the ZNA small, mobile and hard hitting units.

 Further to this, the ZNA has also been putting more emphasis on negotiating water obstacles. This also is from experience in DRC and its vast waterways. The acquisition of Type 84A Heavy Duty Mechanised Bridges, ferries and boats coupled with annual brigade level, opposed river crossing exercises is evidence of this. See also 5 Brigade Conducts Opposed River Crossing Exercise.

While not getting much coverage and publicity, I expect the Boat Squadron to have gone through a lot of reform, re-equipping and likely have its role redefined. Combined arms exercises and command courses are taking place more often and teach the field commanders leading an all-arms force.

Security sector reform

This is my first posting. The idea here is to discuss the Zimbabwean military and issue relevant to the security of Zimbabwe.

Currently there is a lot of talk and push by external forces to reform the security sector in Zimbabwe. Just the idea of external forces, especially hostile forces to Zimbabwe pushing the country to change and reform its security structures is suspicious to say the least. The details of a country’s military are discussed by a select few of its citizens as a sensitive and very important issue.

The idea of countries that have advocated for “regime change”, countries that have sent commandoes and spies into Zimbabwe, countries that have ideas, proposals and plans drawn up by their military institutions on invading the country so they can have access to our resources, countries whose prime ministers have asked their military commanders on how to invade Zimbabwe ... ... the idea that these countries can even be listened to when it comes to structure our defence force is absurd to say the least. It is like asking the burglar of the village how best to secure your house.